We planted one impossible claim. First Landed caught it.

This is a real production scan of a synthetic CV for Daniel Lim, frozen as returned by the engine.

2008 Chronology claim flagged
Disclosure

Synthetic test case: no real candidate is depicted. We planted the 2008 desk-leadership claim to test whether the engine catches a chronology problem. The scan result below is frozen sample output from that synthetic CV.

48/100 Fit score
Hard stop short of perfect Sample output

Verdict

Needs more evidence

The candidate has relevant domain experience in FX trading and some Python/SQL usage, which aligns with the JD's need for understanding FX/rates products and trader communication. The strongest evidence is the direct FX trading experience at StraitsBridge Bank and partnership with quants on backtesting. The single biggest factor keeping the score low is the complete lack of defensible evidence for the core JD requirement of owning a model lifecycle from hypothesis to desk feedback; the CV describes trading and review duties but not quant research or model development.

Score breakdown

  1. Hard requirements coverage requirements
    15/35

    The candidate shows strong Python/SQL and FX/rates understanding, but lacks any evidence of publishing practical research or owning a model lifecycle.

  2. Experience relevance relevance
    18/30

    Direct FX trading experience and partnership with quants provide adjacent relevance, but the core experience is trading, not quant research.

  3. Evidence quality evidence
    10/20

    Specific skills and tools are listed, but key claims like "partnered with quants on backtesting" lack detail on the candidate's research contribution.

  4. Claim defensibility defensibility
    5/15

    One claim about leading a desk in 2008 is impossible given the candidate's education timeline, severely undermining credibility.

Strongest angle

The candidate's six years as an FX trader at StraitsBridge Bank, where they priced G10/Asia FX products and partnered with quants on backtesting, provides direct market intuition and trader communication skills required for the role.

Missing evidence

  • Any evidence of publishing practical research or a research note that traders acted upon.
  • Proof of owning a model lifecycle: a specific example of developing a hypothesis, building a model, testing it, and receiving desk feedback.
  • Concrete examples of Python/SQL use for market data analysis beyond basic scripting (e.g., signal testing, performance decay review).
  • Documentation of model assumptions or market intuition created by the candidate.

Risky claims

This is the interview attack surface, what a careful reviewer is most likely to push back on, not a list of mistakes. The candidate should read it as preparation.

1 line · 0 defensible · 0 need proof · 1 cut
  • CLAIM #01

    "LED THE ENTIRE LONDON FX TRADING DESK DURING THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS, MANAGING A USD 50 BILLION BOOK AND DELIVERING USD 300 MILLION P&L IN THE FIRST QUARTER."

    CUT
    Why a reviewer pushes back

    The synthetic candidate's education timeline shows undergraduate study from 2008-2011, making the desk-leadership claim impossible as written.

    Smallest proof

    A verifiable employment contract or internal desk structure document from 2008. The synthetic materials intentionally do not contain one, so the line is cut.

One example bullet rewrite

Before

Partnered with quants on backtesting carry and momentum screens.

After

Collaborated with quant researchers to define backtest parameters for carry and momentum signals, providing trader intuition that improved model assumptions; the refined screen was adopted for daily [NEEDS PROOF: e.g., 3-month] pilot testing on the Asia FX desk.

Next step

Gather concrete proof of quant research output, such as a redacted research note, backtest code repository, or documented example of a model you helped move from prototype to desk use, before applying.

What you saw

Fair credit, then a hard stop.

The useful signal is not a low score. The scan gave credit for real FX trading experience, then isolated the one impossible 2008 claim as an interview-killing risk. It shows fair scoring, specific evidence gaps, and no permission to keep an indefensible line.

Try it

Run your own free scan.

Paste one CV and one JD. The scan is built to surface fit, missing proof, and claims you should not carry into an interview.

Run a free scan